How Much Does an AI Wingman Drone Cost?

Published on June 22, 2026 | Written by Alec Pow
This article was researched using 9 sources. See our methodology and corrections policy.

An AI wingman drone is expected to cost under $30 million per aircraft, with the safest public estimate currently around $25 million to $30 million each. That estimate applies to the U.S. Air Force Collaborative Combat Aircraft program, including the General Atomics FQ-42 and Anduril FQ-44. The exact contract prices have not been released, so the figure should be treated as a working public estimate, not a confirmed sticker price.

The strange part is that these aircraft are being described as “affordable,” even though one could still cost more than a luxury mansion. In Air Force language, affordable means something different. It means cheaper than a crewed fighter jet, cheap enough to buy in large numbers, and cheap enough to risk in dangerous airspace without putting a pilot inside.

That is why the AI wingman drone cost question matters now. The Air Force has moved the first Collaborative Combat Aircraft, or CCA, from prototype competition into production, while also separating the airframe from the mission autonomy software. In plain English, the drone and its AI brain are not necessarily one neat invoice.

Article Highlights

Jump to sections

• The expected AI wingman drone cost is under $30 million (equivalent to 500 work-years at $30 per hour, or about $12,000,000 in 1990 dollars) per aircraft, with public estimates most often landing near $25 million to $30 million.
• The Air Force has not disclosed the exact FQ-42 or FQ-44 contract values, order quantities, or per-aircraft prices.
• The fiscal 2027 CCA request includes $996.5 million for procurement, $150 million in advance procurement, and about $1.37 billion for research and development.
• A 150-drone fleet could represent roughly $3.75 billion to $4.5 billion in aircraft-only cost if each drone lands between $25 million and $30 million.
• The full program cost will be higher once autonomy software, weapons, spares, testing, maintenance, training, data links, and support equipment are included.

How Much Does an AI Wingman Drone Cost?

The best current answer is this: an AI wingman drone is expected to cost less than $30 million (about $12,000,000 in 1990 dollars) each, with a reasonable public range of about $25 million to $30 million per aircraft. That estimate comes from the Air Force’s long-running cost target for Collaborative Combat Aircraft and from defense reporting around the first production awards.

The Air Force did not publish a clean unit price when it announced the first production contracts. That is the first thing readers should understand. The June 2026 production announcement named the FQ-42 and FQ-44 and said the aircraft were ready for full-scale manufacturing, but it did not give a lot price, aircraft count, or manufacturer-by-manufacturer split. The official release did say the program is aimed at more than 150 combat-capable CCAs by the end of the decade and about 1,000 combat-capable aircraft over time, according to the Air Force announcement on the CCA contracts.

Reuters reported the same core limitation: the Air Force awarded production contracts to General Atomics for the FQ-42 and Anduril for the FQ-44, but the service did not disclose the cost or size of the order. That makes any exact online number suspicious unless it is clearly labeled as an estimate, as noted in Reuters’ report on the General Atomics and Anduril production awards.

Cost layer	Best public number	What it means
Estimated AI wingman drone unit cost	$25 million to $30 million	Working public estimate, not a disclosed contract price
Upper cost target	Under $30 million	Roughly one-third the price of an F-35A-style comparison point
FY2027 CCA procurement request	$996.5 million	Initial buying money, not a simple unit-price total
FY2027 CCA R&D request	About $1.37 billion	Development spending separate from procurement
Long-term CCA fleet goal	About 1,000 aircraft	Aircraft-only math could run into the tens of billions

What Is an AI Wingman Drone?

An AI wingman drone is an uncrewed fighter-type aircraft designed to fly with crewed combat jets. It is not a small quadcopter, and it is not a one-way exploding drone. The Air Force term is Collaborative Combat Aircraft, often shortened to CCA.

The aircraft is meant to extend a pilot’s reach. A crewed fighter could use these drones to scout, carry sensors, jam enemy systems, draw fire, carry weapons, or add extra missile capacity without putting another pilot in the sky. The aircraft still sits inside a human-commanded military system, but it uses autonomy software to carry out parts of the mission.

The Air Force gave the first two CCA aircraft the designations YFQ-42A and YFQ-44A before production. The “Y” marked the prototype phase, “F” stands for fighter, and “Q” identifies the aircraft as uncrewed, according to the Air Force explanation of the YFQ-42A and YFQ-44A designations.

The FQ-42 and FQ-44

General Atomics will build the FQ-42, while Anduril will build the FQ-44. That matters because the program is no longer just a concept sketch about “robot wingmen.” It has moved into manufacturing decisions.

General Atomics says the FQ-42A is a purpose-built uncrewed fighter with a modular design for mission systems and autonomy software. The company also says the YFQ-42A made its first flight in August 2025 and that the production contract begins delivery of aircraft to the warfighter, according to General Atomics’ FQ-42A production release.

Anduril’s aircraft is the FQ-44, based on its Fury design. The company says the contract covers production aircraft and establishes a structure for the Air Force to buy additional lots across the next several years, according to Anduril’s FQ-44 production announcement.

The Exact Price Is Still Hidden

The price is hidden because military aircraft contracts rarely behave like retail purchases. The first public award can include aircraft, manufacturing preparation, engineering work, test support, contractor services, and options for future lots. It can also leave out important pieces, especially when software is being acquired separately.

Breaking Defense reported that the Air Force is keeping the program cost obscured and has not said how many vehicles each hardware provider will supply through the first production lots. The same report said officials still pointed to the long-standing target of roughly one-third the cost of an F-35, which would put the CCA below $30 million (about $12,000,000 in 1990 dollars) when compared with an F-35A around $82.5 million in recent production lots, according to Breaking Defense’s coverage of the CCA selection.

That is the honest way to write the number. The FQ-42 and FQ-44 do not have a confirmed public sticker price yet. They have a public cost target, a budget request, and enough reporting to support a narrow estimate.

What the Air Force Budget Tells Us

The budget gives a better clue than the contract headline. The Air Force fiscal 2027 request includes $996.5 million for CCA procurement, plus $150 million in advance procurement for 2028. The same budget picture includes about $1.37 billion in research and development for the program, according to Air & Space Forces Magazine’s breakdown of the CCA budget request.

Simple division is tempting but dangerous. If $996.5 million bought only aircraft at $25 million each, it would cover almost 40 drones. At $30 million each, it would cover about 33. But procurement lines can include more than aircraft. Initial spares, support equipment, production tooling, data, and other early fielding costs can all bend the math.

Assumed unit cost	What $996.5 million could buy if it were aircraft-only	Why the real number may differ
$25 million each	About 40 aircraft	Procurement may include spares and support, not just aircraft
$27.5 million each	About 36 aircraft	Useful midpoint estimate
$30 million each	About 33 aircraft	Close to the public ceiling often discussed

What a 150-Drone Fleet Could Cost

The Air Force wants more than 150 combat-capable Collaborative Combat Aircraft by the end of the decade. If the aircraft cost lands in the $25 million to $30 million range, the aircraft-only bill for 150 drones would be roughly $3.75 billion to $4.5 billion.

Fleet size	At $25 million each	At $30 million each
50 drones	$1.25 billion	$1.5 billion
100 drones	$2.5 billion	$3 billion
150 drones	$3.75 billion	$4.5 billion
1,000 drones	$25 billion	$30 billion

Those are not full program costs. They are aircraft-only math. Once the Air Force pays for autonomy software, weapons, sensors, training, spare engines or parts, maintenance, simulators, facilities, and contractor support, the total bill gets much larger.

AI Wingman Drones Cheaper Than F-35s

The whole point of the CCA program is to add combat mass without buying another full-price crewed fighter every time the Air Force needs more capacity. A modern fighter has a cockpit, life support, ejection seat, pilot interface, training pipeline, and survivability requirements built around keeping a human alive. An uncrewed aircraft can be designed differently.

This is where the F-35 comparison gets useful. Recent F-35 public pricing places the F-35A airframe around $82.5 million before the separate engine cost, with typical engined totals moving much closer to the high $90 million range. That makes a $25 million to $30 million CCA look cheap by fighter standards, even though it is still extremely expensive compared with ordinary drones. For the full fighter comparison, see our guide to how much an F-35 jet costs.

That comparison also explains why officials care about the one-third target. If one crewed fighter costs roughly as much as three AI wingman drones, the Air Force can build larger formations without scaling pilots and high-end fighters at the same rate.

Why They Still Cost Tens of Millions

An AI wingman drone is cheaper than an F-35, but it is not cheap like a battlefield quadcopter. It still needs a jet airframe, propulsion, flight controls, secure communications, military-grade sensors, electronic warfare resilience, weapons integration, testing, manufacturing quality control, and software that can be trusted around crewed aircraft.

CSIS has warned that the program’s price could climb if the Air Force adds too many fighter-like requirements. Former Air Force Secretary Frank Kendall’s estimate placed CCAs at $25 million to $30 million each, while earlier low-cost autonomous aircraft ideas had aimed much lower. That gap is part of the tension in the program, as discussed in the CSIS analysis of the Collaborative Combat Aircraft program.

The cost drivers are not mysterious. The more survivable, stealthy, long-range, heavily armed, sensor-rich, and independent the drone becomes, the more it starts to behave like an unmanned fighter rather than a cheap flying accessory.

The Software Sold Separately Problem

The Air Force is not treating the aircraft and the autonomy software as one locked package. That is smart for competition, but it makes public price reading harder. A $25 million to $30 million aircraft estimate may not tell you what the government ultimately pays for mission autonomy, licenses, upgrades, test evaluation, and integration.

The Air Force says it awarded mission autonomy production contracts to a vendor pool that includes Anduril, General Atomics, Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman, RTX Collins Aerospace, and Shield AI. It also says the architecture is meant to keep software competition open instead of locking the service into one permanent vendor.

For taxpayers, that cuts both ways. Separate software competitions can keep pressure on prices and make upgrades faster. They can also create a second cost stream that does not show up when someone quotes only the aircraft price.

FQ-42 vs FQ-44 Cost Differences

There is no public evidence yet that the FQ-42 costs more than the FQ-44, or the other way around. The safe version is that both aircraft were selected for Increment 1 production, both met the Air Force’s schedule and performance needs, and both are part of the first production push.

The aircraft are not identical. The War Zone describes the first operational CCA plan as a split fleet and notes that the General Atomics and Anduril designs are different enough to give the Air Force more operational options, according to The War Zone’s report on the FQ-42 and FQ-44 production orders.

Different designs can eventually mean different prices. One aircraft might emphasize payload, another might emphasize manufacturing speed, range, or operational flexibility. Until the Air Force releases lot-level values, though, any precise FQ-42 versus FQ-44 cost comparison would be guesswork.

AI Wingman Drones vs With Other Drones

The easiest mistake is to hear “drone” and think of a small, low-cost aircraft. CCAs belong in a different category. They are closer to uncrewed fighter aircraft than to small loitering munitions or stadium-defense interceptors.

System	Public cost context	What the comparison shows
AI wingman drone / CCA	Estimated $25 million to $30 million each	Cheaper than a crewed fighter, expensive for a drone
F-35A fighter	Often near the high tens of millions before full package costs	Main benchmark for the one-third-cost goal
MQ-1 Predator	$20 million for a four-aircraft system in FY2009 dollars	Older remotely piloted aircraft pricing is not a clean CCA comparison
Hunter-catcher drone	Much lower aircraft-level price point	Useful contrast for small counter-drone systems

That is why comparisons need care. An older Predator system, for example, included multiple aircraft plus ground control and support elements, not just one aircraft sitting on a runway. Our guide to MQ-1 Predator drone cost explains why military drone pricing often mixes aircraft, control stations, crews, satellite links, and support gear.

At the other end, smaller interceptor drones are closer to security equipment than fighter-like combat aircraft. The public cost story around the Hunter-Catcher Drone cost shows how wide the gap can be between a reusable counter-drone aircraft and a jet-powered AI wingman built for contested airspace.

What Is Not Included

The sticker price, even when we finally get one, will not be the whole bill. That is true for almost every military aircraft, but it is especially true here because the Air Force is separating hardware and software.

Extra costs can include:

• Mission autonomy software and licensing
• Weapons such as air-to-air missiles or other stores
• Sensor payloads and electronic warfare packages
• Secure datalinks and networking equipment
• Ground mission-planning systems
• Training for pilots who will command CCA formations
• Simulators and testing infrastructure
• Spare parts, replacement engines, and depot work
• Contractor logistics support
• Future software upgrades and performance testing

That is why a fleet estimate based only on $25 million to $30 million per aircraft is a starting point. It is not the lifetime cost of owning and operating the fleet.

Is an AI Wingman Drone Disposable?

No, not in the way people usually use that word. The better term is attritable. That means the aircraft is affordable enough to risk in dangerous missions where losing one would not be as catastrophic as losing a crewed fighter and pilot.

But an aircraft that costs tens of millions is not something commanders will casually throw away. The CCA is meant to be risk-tolerant, not worthless. It sits between two worlds: far cheaper than a high-end crewed fighter, far more capable and expensive than a disposable one-way drone.

That middle position is the whole strategy. The Air Force wants more aircraft in the fight without buying only the most expensive crewed jets. The CCA gives a pilot more reach, more sensors, more weapons, and more tactical options without requiring another pilot in another cockpit.

Real-Life Cost Examples

Example 1: A first CCA buy using the FY2027 procurement request

If the $996.5 million procurement line were treated as aircraft-only money, it could suggest about 33 to 40 aircraft at $25 million to $30 million each. In reality, the number could be lower because first-lot procurement can include spares, support equipment, manufacturing preparation, and other costs.

Example 2: A 150-aircraft end-of-decade fleet

At $25 million per drone, 150 aircraft would cost $3.75 billion before support. At $30 million each, the same fleet would cost $4.5 billion. Add software, training, weapons, spares, and sustainment, and the full program bill moves higher.

Example 3: A long-term 1,000-aircraft CCA force

A 1,000-drone fleet would imply $25 billion to $30 billion in aircraft-only spending at the current public estimate. That sounds huge, but it is the kind of scale the Air Force is considering because the aircraft are meant to add mass alongside F-35s, F-22s, and future combat aircraft.